Continues from Why approximate sum is composition.
With the same conventions as in that post, we just translate the S combinator
into
With the notation from arXiv:2110.08178, page 4, “Curvature as deviation from linearity”, we see that
therefore S is the deviation from linearity, aka curvature.
Another interpretation of the S combinator comes from , which in translation has the form
From two beta reductions like (the first one)
we arrive to
which is a relative dilation, of coefficient , based at w and the coefficient . Let’s use a notation which I can write on this page:
So
It appears in the abstraction elimination, or in the process of turning lambda terms into SKI combinators. Say is the conversion of the term A. Part of the definition of T (the one which is the abstraction elimination) is
(which is a very awkward and so human based way to use the same w in two lambda operations… intuitively clear though)
In translation this would read as
_____
4 thoughts on “Why the S combinator is curvature”