Emergent sums and differences in graphic lambda calculus
See the page Graphic lambda calculus for background.
Here I want to discuss the treatment of one identity concerning approximate sums and differences in emergent algebras. The identity is the following:
The approximate sum (maybe emergent sum would be a better name) has the following associated graph in $GRAPH$:
The letters in red “” are there only for the convenience of the reader.
Likewise, the graph in which corresponds to the approximate difference (or emergent difference)
is the following:
The graph which corresponds to is this one:
By a succession of CO-ASSOC moves we arrive to this graph:
We are ready to apply an R2 move to get:
We use now an ext2 move at the node marked by “1″
followed by local pruning
Here comes the funny part! We cannot continue unless we work with a graph where at the edges marked by the red letters “” we put two disjoint (not connected by edges) graphs in
, say
:
Let us suppose that from the beginning we had connected at the edges marked by the red letters
, and proceed further. My claim is that by three GLOBAL FAN-OUT moves we can make the following move
We use this move and we obtain:
As previously, we use an R2 move and another ext2 move to finally obtain this:
which is the answer we were looking for. We could use GLOBAL PRUNING to get rid of the part of the graph which ends by a termination gate.
-
January 7, 2013 at 5:50 pm | #1Let’s use the zipper « chorasimilarity
-
March 1, 2013 at 2:08 pm | #2Emergent algebras as combinatoriy logic (Part III) | chorasimilarity











